Inquiry Basket
PCR experiments often fail despite careful optimization and following instructions of thermal cycling conditions, buffer components, and sample preparation methods. The cause of failures resulting in no apparent product, shifted Ct values, or abnormal amplification plots (aside from malfunctioning equipment or degraded templates) can usually be traced to the quality, design, or storage of the primers/probes. Breakdown with age, structures that impede hybridization, and impurities from synthesis can lead to inactive oligonucleotides. Being aware of where synthetic oligonucleotides can fail will allow you to troubleshoot the issue.
Fig. 1 PCR process diagram of primers with incomplete homology with the template.1,5
Technical failure of amplification-based assays is more often due to bad oligonucleotides instead of mistakes made by the technician. Oxidation and hydrolysis can occur during primer and probe synthesis and purification, producing oxidized phosphates and shortened pieces that cannot be extended by polymerases. Poor storage can also physically damage oligonucleotides. In addition, poor primer or probe design can hide reactive ends within structures such as primer dimers or hairpins. Incomplete purification can also leave overhangs from synthesis components that can inhibit reactions. Whenever there is an assay failure, the common practice is to run a new reaction using known good reagents (freshly made or from a new supplier) to ensure the protocol is working. If it is, then the problem is assumed to be with the older aliquots of reagents or instrument failure. However, the real problem could be with an old template or poor quality chemicals that were used.
| Issue Category | Manifestation | Experimental Impact | Preventive Strategy |
| Chemical degradation | Fragmented sequences | Reduced amplification efficiency | Proper storage; avoidance of repeated freeze-thaw |
| Secondary structures | Hairpins; dimers | Primer unavailability; nonspecific products | Redesign; elevated annealing temperatures |
| Synthesis impurities | Truncated sequences | Variable reaction kinetics | High-resolution purification |
Table 1 Common Oligonucleotide Issues in PCR and qPCR Applications
Primers and probes are synthetic oligonucleotides that are considered one of the critical parameters affecting amplification, but are typically taken for granted in most laboratories. Poor primer/probe quality can result from low chemical purity or physical degradation. Unnoticed and unsuspected poor primer/probe quality can have dominant negative effects by binding to and sequestering DNA polymerases and/or fluorescence detection molecules thereby causing poor assay sensitivity and specificity. Physical degradation of primers and probes can occur over time with freeze/thaw cycles, cross-contamination with nucleases, or other mishandling of the solution. Chemical poor quality can lead to the same effects with repeated failures to reproduce what appear to be the same conditions with reagent lots or reactions performed weeks or months apart, causing the user to mistrust their thermocycler or template rather than consider the chemicals that fuel the reaction.
PCR failures are frequently due to primers. Degraded primers, poor primer design, contaminants, and storage conditions can lead to poor PCR efficiency, nonspecific products or no amplification at all even when cycling conditions and reagents are optimal. Primer design problems can arise from secondary structural motifs or thermodynamic inconsistencies that prevent annealing while contamination and degradation can occur through physical damage to the chemical nature of the primer. Primers are short stretches of DNA that need to have an exact sequence with proper melting properties and lack of secondary structures that inhibit extension by a polymerase. If a problem arises with these processes it can cause aberrant PCR products or no signal at all. This can lead to miscalculations of gene quantity, failure to identify a pathogen or misrepresentation of gene expression. Properly designed primers that have gone through thermodynamic checkers and inspections for secondary structures and degradation will help alleviate these problems.
Poorly designed primers are poorly functioning due to thermodynamic and structural weaknesses. Primers with melting temperatures below 50–65 °C hybridize inefficiently. High melting temperatures can lead to inefficient polymerase extension due to insufficient annealing time during PCR cycling, while low melting temperatures may lead to primer binding to other sequences. Primers with unbalanced GC content especially greater than 60% or less than 40% may have weak areas affecting binding stability or cause mis-priming. Failure to check primer sequences against genomic databases can allow for annealing of primers to similar sequences. These include paralogous genes or repeats which can lead to non-specific amplification, skewing results. Not placing primer sites across exon-exon boundaries if genomic DNA contaminates your cDNA template will allow for amplification of your genomic DNA. All of these issues lead to decreased efficiency and specificity. Poor efficiency can lead to inaccurate quantitation. Missed targets due to poor primer design lead to wasted resources as the qPCR assay will need to be redesigned.
An additional possibility for failure during primer design is the unintended creation of secondary structures. These structures trap the 3'OH group preventing extension by polymerases. Secondary structures can arise within a primer, called hairpins when the sequences within a primer become complementary to each other. Secondary structures can also occur between primers, called primer dimers. Primer dimers can occur when the 3'ends of primers are complementary to each other because they can extend off of each other during cycling. Secondary structures and primer dimers lower yields by sequestering primer, polymerase and nucleotides away from the template DNA. They also produce smaller products that will fluoresce if detected in real-time PCR. These can be predicted by calculating the delta G of self-dimers and heterodimers. A delta G of lower than -9 kcal/mol indicates significant secondary structure formation. Secondary structures can be avoided by redesigning the primer so the problem sequence is removed. They can also be avoided by lowering the concentration of the primer so intermolecular interactions are not favored. Hot-start enzymes can also be used to prevent secondary structures by not activating until high temperatures have been reached.
Fluorogenic probes designed for use in qPCR assays have been observed to face unique obstacles that could lead to loss of sensitivity, specificity and quantification ability of the assay. When used with fluorogenic probes, the excitation light source remains constant during amplification because the fluorophore and quencher are linked so that the reporter molecule's fluorescence is quenched. Once the probe has hybridized to its complementary target sequence during PCR amplification, the probe is cleaved by the polymerase's 5' to 3' exonuclease activity allowing the fluorescent reporter to emit light. Problems that can arise include photobleaching of the reporter dye, decreased quenching efficiency, and probe degradation which releases the reporter dye into solution (increasing background). Because fluorophores are often hydrophobic, probe aggregation or probe adherence to the walls of the reaction vessel can occur. Optimization of probe concentration and quencher pair choices along with protecting the probes from degradation can help eliminate these issues.
Typical problems with fluorogenic probe assays include low signal to noise ratio. Either the assay produces too little signal (fluorescence when the target is amplified) or too much background (fluorescence in the absence of the target). Reasons for weak signals include probe concentrations below the level needed to fully saturate amplicons, poor five-prime exonuclease activity by the polymerase, or fluorophore photobleaching. Probe degradation via hydrolysis or nucleases present in the reaction will also decrease the probe concentration lowering the increase in fluorescence when the target is present. Reasons for high background include incomplete quenching of the fluorophore (usually due to excess probe), probe partial melting, separating the fluorophore from the quencher, or contamination with unbound fluorophore (due to probe hydrolysis or incomplete purification of the synthetic probe). False negatives can occur when the signal to noise ratio is low enough that positives fall under the limits of instrument detection.
Fluorophore-quencher pair compatibility is another consideration. As mentioned above, optimal overlap of the fluorophore emission spectrum and quencher absorption spectrum is required for effective quenching of the intact probe and for signal generation after cleavage. Poor overlaps result in inefficient quenching and high background fluorescence. Quenchers that have significant overlap with fluorophores that they do not quench can reduce the signal after cleavage. There are many quenchers (e.g., the Black Hole Quencher series) that have very large absorption spectra and overlap with many fluorophores. These quenchers do not fluoresce themselves, but rather transfer the energy as heat, eliminating background fluorescence that can come from fluorescent quenchers. The relative orientation of the fluorophore and quencher can also play a role in fluorescence quenching as distance and rotation between the two chromophores affects energy transfer. Factors that restrict movement between the fluorophore and quencher, such as a rigid linker peptide or forced secondary structure, can change the spectroscopic properties of the fluorophore and quencher.
| Issue Category | Experimental Manifestation | Underlying Cause |
| Low signal intensity | High cycle thresholds, weak amplification curves | Insufficient probe concentration, photobleaching, or inefficient cleavage |
| High background fluorescence | Elevated baseline, poor signal discrimination | Incomplete quenching, probe degradation, or free fluorophore contamination |
| Spectral mismatch | Reduced signal change, poor quantitative precision | Inadequate fluorophore-quencher spectral overlap |
| Environmental degradation | Drifting baselines, inconsistent replicate performance | Photobleaching, hydrolysis, or aggregation |
Table 2 Fluorogenic Probe Issues and Diagnostic Indicators
The quality of synthetic oligonucleotides affects the outcome of PCR amplification. Purification methods influence the yield, specificity, and quantitative accuracy. All synthetic routes produce a mixture of species, including some terminated failure sequences, desilylated nucleotides, and other side reactions that may affect the activity of the oligonucleotide. The desired product, a full length, protected-free oligonucleotide. One may tolerate lower purity reagents for qualitative PCR but not for quantitative and diagnostic PCR. Grades of oligonucleotide specify the level of purification that has been performed. Lower amplification efficiency can often be traced to poor quality oligonucleotides.
An inherent side effect of solid-phase oligonucleotide synthesis is that a mixture of deletion products is formed as a result of cumulative coupling failures (each cycle fails to couple a small percentage of nucleotide building blocks). Deletion primers of n-1, n-2, and shorter lengths are not able to support DNA polymerase synthesis but will hybridize to the template strand reducing the effective concentration of primer. Desalting techniques will only separate small molecule impurities like nucleotide coupling reagents and excess salts. Failures can make up as much as 15 to 20% of crude oligonucleotide reactions. For most PCR reactions this failure rate is acceptable but when performing quantitative PCR where precise knowledge of the concentration and efficiency of amplification is needed, greater purity (obtained with reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography or PAGE) reducing failures to below 5% will improve kinetics.
Batch-to-batch variation from chemical synthesis will affect quality of oligonucleotides and therefore reproducibility and comparison between experiments. Different coupling efficiencies for target oligonucleotides, rate of deprotection, or recovery from purification can lead to differences in amount of full length versus degraded product between batches. This means that although you may be using the same amount of primer as quantified by UV spectrophotometry, you will actually have different concentrations of active primer. Differences in primer performance can show up as changing Ct's during quantitative experiments or differences in yield during endpoint reactions. Although process controls and ensuring that your oligonucleotides are made under a quality management system with process controls (including in-process controls and release testing) will minimize this variation between batches, it is important to watch for shifts in performance as new batches of oligonucleotides are used.
Synthesis by phosphoramidite method is highly efficient but inherently imperfect. The sequential method of solid-phase oligonucleotide synthesis ensures that some amount of imperfect sequences are created at each cycle step. Failure to extend all of the primers causes two classes of sequence-length failure that compete with full length product. These impurities usually carry through even after purification by desalting because they are themselves free oligonucleotides. Failure to amplify in PCR can result if these impurities are incorporated into a primer at significant levels. Side reactions and degradation of the synthetic oligonucleotide over time can also result in alterations of the original product. Knowledge of how and why these reactions occur can help you choose the correct purification method and storage conditions for your reagents.
Fig. 2 Phosphoramidite-based oligonucleotide synthesis.2,5
Efficiency of phosphoramidite coupling reactions utilized in solid-phase synthesis is high but incomplete (typically 98-99.5% depending on sequence and scale), which results in accumulation of deletion products (nucleotide chain that is shortened by one or more nucleotides) or truncated chains missing the last nucleotide (n-1). Truncated strands can result from incomplete capping reactions that leave residual reactive molecules that allow incorporation of upstream nucleotides, causing a frameshift. These truncated deletion fragments will still anneal to the target template decreasing the concentration of functional primer. Products lacking only the final nucleotide fail to support DNA polymerase extension efficiently. The percent PCR failure increases as the length of the primer increases or as the scale of the synthesis decreases.
Chemical damage to synthetic oligonucleotides over time reduces their usefulness. Stored oligonucleotides can be damaged by oxidation, hydrolysis, and depurination. Oligonucleotides are susceptible to acid hydrolysis of their phosphodiester linkages. Exposure to water will cause acid hydrolysis if the oligonucleotide solution is not well buffered. Concentration of solutes during freeze/thaw can cause local acid hydrolysis. Reactive oxygen species can oxidize the nucleobases of oligonucleotides creating modified bases that inhibit extension by DNA polymerases or mispriming. Depurination of oligonucleotides creates abasic sites that inhibit DNA polymerases or cause misincorporation. Heating, exposure to laboratory lighting, and freeze/thaw cycles can all contribute to the damage of oligonucleotides. Damaged oligonucleotides decrease the effective concentration of oligonucleotides because they may still bind to template DNA but not extend properly during PCR.
Modified oligonucleotides such as fluorescently labeled oligonucleotides, backbone modified oligonucleotides or oligonucleotides with terminal conjugation, require specific chemical treatment during synthesis. This chemical treatment leaves these oligonucleotides susceptible to modification specific impurities that can negatively affect PCR reactions. Typical impurities that arise during synthesis of modified oligonucleotides include truncated failure to add a phosphoramidite monomer during a cycle of synthesis and side reactions that create oligonucleotides with extra modifications or modification in the wrong location. Fluorescent dyes are particularly susceptible to colorless modifications during acidic or basic deprotection. Due to the similar structure between these impurities and full-length modified oligonucleotides they are often difficult to separate by typical purification processes. These impurities may be amplified during PCR reactions in which they can act as competitive inhibitors due to mismatched hybridization characteristics. For these reasons modified oligonucleotides require more extensive characterization.
Determining that oligonucleotide quality contributed to PCR failure can be a useful step in troubleshooting PCR reactions after ruling out other variables such as thermal cycling conditions, template, and enzyme. Assessment of whether oligonucleotide design or quality contributed to failure can lead the researcher to redesign primer sequences with software to remove secondary structure or acquire higher-quality oligonucleotides free of primer-dimer sequences, or acquire new oligonucleotides if poor quality is due to improper storage. Thorough record keeping during troubleshooting and taking steps to ensure proper storage and routine evaluation can prevent future issues with oligonucleotide quality.
Optimization of oligos by computational design Sometimes amplification of a particular target sequence fails due to thermodynamic reasons. If a primer pair is poorly performing (low specificity) or forming too many secondary structures, the primer sequences can be shuffled to a different region with different GC content, trimmed to lower Tm, lengthened to increase Tm, etc. Degenerate bases can be added to positions where there is sequence variability. Similarly, if a probe is poorly performing, it can be shuffled to a nearby region that may form fewer secondary structures or the fluorophore/quencher can be changed. It is a good idea to run these new sequences through programs that calculate Tm, hairpin-dimer formation etc. to make sure that they will work prior to synthesis.
If troubleshooting steps haven't remedied amplification problems that you suspect are due to poor oligo quality, try increasing the purity grade of your oligo or using oligos made by another company. Reasons you might want to try a new purification grade are if your Ct values are regularly high even under optimal conditions, if you are consistently seeing more than one band on a gel after PCR, or if your Ct values vary between orders of the same oligo. Using HPLC or PAGE purified oligos instead of desalted oligos can help eliminate shorter oligos and synthesis byproducts that can affect enzyme function or cause extra bands on a gel. If changing the purity doesn't help, trying oligos from a different company can eliminate variables in the chemistry used to synthesize the oligo, the quality control measures they have in place, and how the oligos are handled before shipping. Look for companies that have good quality control procedures, provide batch-specific documentation, and have consistent quality between smaller and large-scale syntheses if you will need a high quantity of the oligo.
Failure of PCR amplification due to oligonucleotide quality can be mitigated by anticipating potential issues with careful ordering, storage, and testing of oligonucleotides. Upon receipt, oligonucleotides can be quantified using spectrophotometry to ensure correct concentration. Higher-quality assays that require regulatory documentation may warrant analytical testing such as HPLC or MS to confirm purity. Aliquot appropriate volumes of oligonucleotide and store at the recommended temperatures away from light and moisture. Track how long oligonucleotides have been stored and test regularly to ensure that they are working within their expiration date. Validate performance by generating a standard curve or amplifying positive controls prior to use. By keeping records of lot numbers and characteristics of your oligonucleotides, faulty oligonucleotides can quickly be identified and discarded.
| Issues | Probable Cause | Initial Intervention | Escalation Strategy |
| High cycle thresholds, weak amplification | Truncated sequences, low effective concentration | Re-quantify, adjust input amount | Upgrade to HPLC purification |
| Multiple product bands, smearing | Non-specific priming, primer-dimers | Redesign primers, optimize annealing temperature | Redesign with alternative target regions |
| Drifting quantification, batch variation | Inconsistent synthesis quality | Implement rigorous storage protocols | Change supplier, validate new source |
| Poor signal in probe-based assays | Photobleaching, probe degradation | Fresh probe stocks, protected handling | Redesign probe with |
Table 3 Troubleshooting Decision Matrix for Oligonucleotide-Related PCR Issues
Many PCR and qPCR inconsistencies—such as non-specific amplification, reduced efficiency, or unstable Ct values—can be traced back to primer or probe quality. Sequence accuracy, synthesis efficiency, purification level, and batch consistency all directly influence amplification performance. Our capabilities in PCR and qPCR oligonucleotide synthesis include:
By aligning synthesis chemistry, purification level, and quality control with assay requirements, PCR and qPCR performance variability can often be significantly reduced.
If your experiments show persistent issues—such as primer dimers, low amplification efficiency, high background fluorescence, or inconsistent quantification—it may be beneficial to evaluate primer or probe design and quality. Consider reviewing your oligonucleotide strategy if you are working with:
Early optimization of primer and probe specifications can prevent repeated troubleshooting cycles and improve overall workflow efficiency. Contact our team to discuss your PCR or qPCR oligonucleotide requirements and determine the most suitable synthesis and purification approach for your assay.
References
